Participants’ perception of peers’ similarity off attitudes with the homosexuals is examined having fun with two the same affairs, except for the peers’ sex

Participants’ perception of peers’ similarity off attitudes with the homosexuals is examined having fun with two the same affairs, except for the peers’ sex

All the questions realize: “Community the quantity one to most readily useful describes exactly how most likely your own thoughts for the homosexuals is similar to brand new attitude the majority of your [ male / women ] loved ones provides into homosexuals.” Each other concerns was answered having fun with good 5-section size anywhere between 0 (Nothing at all) so you can cuatro (A great deal). Prior research has found these products so you can mirror respondents’ normative perceptions into homosexual somebody (Herek & Capitanio, 1996). These materials exhibited a good Cronbach’s ? from .70.


We measured religiosity having fun with four affairs: (a) need for religious otherwise spiritual values; (b) frequency out-of church or forehead attendance in the past season; (c) frequency in order to incidents backed from the the spiritual group in past times year; and you may (d) prayer volume previously week. Dependence on religious thinking is actually counted playing with a cuatro-area measure between step one (Perhaps not minder important at all) so you can cuatro (Extremely important). The item computing participants’ attendance in order to a chapel otherwise temple in going back seasons discover, “How many times have you attended a church or temple on earlier in the day 12 months?” Users answered that it from the opting for among after the half dozen categories: Never, From time to time annually, From time to time a year, A few times thirty days, Regular, and most weekly. The latest half dozen address categories to have chapel attendance was as well as useful attendance so you’re able to sponsored spiritual incidents. Prayer regularity are examined with six categories: Never, Once or twice 1 month, From time to time thirty day period, A couple minutes per week, Daily, or higher than simply once a day. Almost every other research has made use of comparable methods from religiosity within their forms and discovered them to feel continuously credible (Herek & Gonzalez-Rivera, from inside the press). Religiosity circumstances had a good Cronbach’s ? off .80 within our data.

Perceptions into the Lesbians and you will Gays

The last section of the questionnaire included the brand new Language-translation of your brand spanking new sorts of the fresh new Attitudes Towards Lesbians and you can Homosexual (ATLG) Measure (Herek, 1984). This 20-goods measure was answered playing with a beneficial 5-part measure anywhere between step one (Highly disagree) so you’re able to 5 (Strongly agree). Respondents’ get is calculated by firmly taking the brand new imply across products such as for instance one highest scores echo a lot more bad thinking for the gay people and you will ladies. In totally new version, the shape shall be divided into a couple 10-goods subscales: the Thinking into Lesbians (ATL) plus the Perceptions on the Gays (ATG) subscales. I translated the brand new ATLG measure on Foreign-language-language right after which straight back translated away from Foreign language into English to be sure equivalency between the two items. Spanish-speaking Puerto Rican folk, exactly who volunteered inside the a pre-take to pilot studies, considered making use of words compatible. Foreign-language and you can English products of your items’ stuff is available from inside the Appendix A good.

Exploratory principle axis foundation analyses which have oblique rotation of the Language version of the ATLG Scale had around three points: an excellent Condemnation-Threshold Basis (17 facts; %), a personal-Expressive Foundation (you to items; 6.75%), and a prices Foundation (a couple things; 6.51%). Such about three portion told me 60.9% of the full difference. The latest informed me variance ones activities are very similar to men and women acquired inside Herek’s (1984) unique study. Following the Herek’s (1984) recommendation, we chose things loading higher simply on the parts matrix of your Condemnation-Tolerance foundation. Immediately after removing step three activities (circumstances dos, eight, 12), we chose to together with treat an additional items (item 17) as it diminished brand new scale’s reliability greatly. The ATLG size ended which have sixteen-factors and you may said 55% of one’s complete variance. The item loadings for a few things is actually demonstrated within the Desk 1 .

Dining table 1

Herek’s ATLG Size has been given in various racial communities through the the usa which have uniform Cronbach’s leader coefficients greater than .87 (Herek, 2000). As the level had not ever been employed for an excellent Puerto Rican decide to try, the latest ATLG-Language type exhibited precision scores (?=.93) similar to people gotten by Herek in an student try (Herek, 1996). To reduce the new inflation of Cronbach’s alpha accuracy coefficient due to the number of issues, i parceled the brand new 16 products on four mixture score. For every single get portrayed the fresh new mean worth for each five-item ATL and you can ATG indicator, respectively. Solution placement of facts by the the rank ordered grounds loadings was indeed accustomed through the indicators towards ATG and you may ATL indicators, respectively. All four-item indications got a good .90 Cronbach’s alpha coefficient.